Field theory derived from the matrix of space
This part is about a quantum-field theory, which is mainly derived from the properties of its medium, the space-time-pulse continuum. The resulting phenomena such as particles, mass / inertia, charge etc. are new explained.
A particle is no longer a separate field, it is the state of the medium at that location.
From this prospective, no new particles are created in CERN, only the state of the location was changed. All forces, all interactions arise from the disturbances of the original oscillation of space, of time (which also oscillates) and of pulse. Instead of mysterious quantum numbers, the states of the place are included in the calculation. There are no more sharp defined places. Everything that is is oscillation, has a different state in every pica-second. Only a constant repetition, a cyclical patterns are what will be recognizable and what counts. The small cycles are the medium of larger ones. There is no beginning, there is no Planck length or Planck time.
measurable physics doesn't stop where measurability ends..
But it also makes no sense to look for limits where none can be. However, in physics, basic values appear to be considerably larger than the limit values of the Standard Model. The concept of a matrix as the geometry of all oscillations of space-time-pulse continuum also includes the influence of other space dimensions, which explains the geometry of standing fields. It is a concept that physics sees only as a limited area of our knowledge and measurability. Reality goes beyond these limits.
Up to this point space was seen as rigid and without any “degree of freedom” according to Feynman. This state is considered a singularity that can never be achieved in reality. A degree of freedom therefore requires elasticity, a bending potential that allows deformation and resistance. Only this elasticity creates the moment h=pulse▪ʎ, a form of energy E=hf. Since h is invariant, only λ and f can change in the space cells. However, the geometry of space-matrix requires that these changes are in digital (integer) relationships.
The edges of tetrahedron and octahedron are the λ, with which the frequency of these space cells is also fixed by the invariable c. If one considers the space cell in the center of a proton as a reference for the smallest part of space, then space, which is still isotropic up to now, would only have one frequency. With the mapping of this space structure over the physical values of particles such as protons, electrons, neutrons and neutrinos, an isotropic view of space can no longer be maintained. The edge size S1 (scale 1) or rod size 1 as a general unit of length must be given up and expanded by rod sizes with certain length ratios (comparable to different energy densities). Again for geometric reasons (see wave and quantum dynamic) the rod sizes have to keep the ratio of 3^x or3^-x to each other. These allow frequencies and neighboring relationships to the adjacent colors (properties) to be retained to the same extent.
A nesting in Babushka-style (or onion-shaped) of the octahedron and tetrahedron requires a certain ratio of their rod sizes, which is referred to below as METRIK. Nesting means unequal spaces with the same center. The ratio of their size is:
< < < 3^-4 ; 3^-3 ; 3^-2 ; 3^-1 ; 3^0 ; 3^1 ; 3^2 ; 3^3 ; 3^4 > > >
Here is M1=S1 (3^0); M2=S^3 (3^1); M3=S9 (3^2); M4=S27 (3^3) etc. As was shown in the main page Matrix, energies in the equilibrium can only be hold in rod sizes S1; S3; S5 etc. The "standing" or "local" fields are meant, which can only have a rod length of odd units. The frequency oscillates in the ratio like tone C to tone G or G to tone C‘.
The standing or bound fields around the center of a particle have their own metric, i.e. your own rod size, pulse and frequency. An interaction with other particles always takes place in the same metric. An electron interacts with a proton e.g. in metric M4.
The standard model (SM) requires the criterion of charge or (+) and (-) for the above-mentioned interaction. This is replaced by the MFT (Matrix-Field-Theory) by the term parity, since MFT regards all particles as oscillation, which means a change of (+) and (-). But this requires to give up the empty space with the mechanics of separate particles. In the MFT, a particle is a modification of space. Therefore a particle oscillation is always in the same rhythm as its medium, here the location (x; y: z: t.) A particle is therefore not (+) but has in this specific location (x; y; z; t) (+). No matter where the interaction particle (here the electron) is, it has the same parity ratio everywhere in space.
proton always has the opposite parity
of the electron at the point of interaction
Field and scale
The normal concept of a field in space is a realm of equal or coherent properties. Its shape and size depend on the scale of its effect. The medium connects space and time cells to a network of the same properties. In the smallest scales of space and time, the order of magnitude of protons, electrons and neutrinos, shapes are formed from octahedra and tetrahedra. They are theoretically sharp-edged. On a larger scale, the corners of the geometric bodies are rounded and foggy (imprecise). On the scale of charge fields of electrons (orbits or orbitals), they become preferred locations with a high probability of a hit (electron detection). On a chemical scale, they get pretty round. But even on this scale there are no longer any individual fields. They are composed of fields with different centers. They are no longer seen as quantized digital quantities and perceived as analog quantities. There are multiple fields with almost the same centers and result in mixed sizes, which consist of single sizes fields quantized (E=hF) and become summed quantities with a distribution E=multiple ΔE / r^2. The former geometrical forms turn to spherical and analogical forms.
Dynamic and standing local fields
From the point of view of space-time, a field has a location and therefore also time in addition to the momentum. A photon is a propagating field that changes location with V = c and freezes time within its system. A particle is a field with the same location but measurable time. The sequences of its oscillation consist of the radius r of the field and time = r/c.
In principle everything is be said about fields. In physics, however, we are primarily concerned with the interaction of the fields and this creates further combinations. In short: there are a large number of field variants.
A field from a unique multiple occurrence with radially outgoing waves with amplitudes E=ΔE/r^2. Shown here as an area. The z-axis shows the energy of the amplitude here. X;Y; symbolizes the space. Multiple causes create an analog field rather than a quantum field situation.
A The illustration here shows a multiple field consisting of the amplitude and the waveform, where volumes of above and below the zero level are equal. The impact wave runs outwards and slowly equalizes to zero. The ratio of the radii of its expansion is complex. (e.g. a volume-related ratio). In quantum dynamics, the ratio here would be just a string or linear or proportional. The wave distances would have a ratio of 3 (see http://www.michaelis.ch/wave-d.html ). You would therefore think that QED (Quantum Electro Dynamics) is much easier to calculate, but you overlooks the fact that there are no distances in our sense. A distance there is always an energy unit. This has a certain digital ratio to the neighboring units of space and time. This is the only way that everything harmonice seamlessly together.
This consideration only applies to flat space. But since the energies in the individual sizes areas (scales S1-Sx) diverge completely, the SM created independent areas of the forces in physics, which are presented as natural forces without deeper cohesion. The areas of strong and weak nuclear force and EM force are explained in more detail below. In this theory of a matrix described here it will be explained later how with the help of the relativity theory all the areas are as stages of the same space.
Here a standing field with its resonance fields. The octahedron in the center is the primary field. In the case of a proton its size would be S1 and in the case of an electron S3. Everything is quantized in this order of magnitude. An interaction would not be E=ΔE / r^2 as with multiple fields, but E=hc / λ, where λ would be the rod length of the field. An interaction only happens 1-dimensionally here. The rods of this size symbolize “strings” of interaction, its length the time (λ/c). The colors of the points shown (knots of the material from which the space consists) are in Standard Model the quantum chromo dynamics of virtual particle. Their oscillation changes their colors per quantum time, but their proportions in the sense of a compensation of spatial density remain and are carriers of the static image. In the status of the undisturbed space, the colors are a symbol of their state, with interaction of the "fields", colors and rod lengths and thus also time and energy are changed. Every field interaction is the game of balancing the spatial density.
Parity and Interaction
Here the topic of parity or charge of part 2
will be deepened: charge / parity
The term parity is a term of oscillation . One aspect of the matrix is still missing. It is hyperspace or 4D space. This is explained more deeply on the main page matrix-dimensions . It is this aspect who creates a stationary field in the medium which has an elastic impulse propagation of V = c. It's an oscillation perpendicular to 3D space. It is not hyperspace itself that is dealed here, but it is the effect in our space, what is embedded in a higher-level space. As a result, space as a medium loses its last classic property of Euclidean space
The space itself can be deformed.
And he will. And with the deformation the space density changes and with the density the time. But time is tied to space because it is an element of oscillation. The oscillation consists of the bending moment Pulse•λ, and the frequency f. λ=c/f ↔ pulse▪c/f.
This defines the strength of the transmitted force and relates it to the λ (radius) of space cells and their frequency. The greater the force transmission, the smaller the space cell or λ of the oscillation that forms this space cell. Everything is dominated by the moment h of the medium. The structure of the matrix results from the absolute balance of all properties involved.The phenomena of our world result from its disruption.
The interaction of onion like arranged fields
From a geometric point of view, a stationary field can only be seen as the cause of an impact from a further dimension. It should be remembered that the philosophical principle applies that there is no limit to the dimensions, only a limit to our understanding. The 4th space dimension demonstrably casts its shadow in our spatial understanding of 3D space. See here Part 1: The dimensions of space and Part 2: The new concept of time.
With this in mind, a point field emerges from the 4D space with the impact,
which is used as the field of the proton and as a scale S1 for further
observations of the spatial geometry.
In addition to the proton, the primary fields of electrons and neutrinos arise. On the way to understanding particles, only the relationships between protons and electrons are important. The neutrinos are too close to the energy fluctuation of the surrounding space or to the entropy of space-time. They have no influence on the proton and electron interaction.
Before explaining the images shown below, paradigms need to be redefined.
1.) A standing field needs the impact from
the 4D space. This is an oscillation, it is energy, a vector quantity that
acts perpendicular to all 3 coordinates of 3D space.
2.) This impact has no direct geometrical influence on our world (the 3D space). All influences are indirect. The primary field of the impact is therefore an indirect quantity that cannot be directly derived from the impact it self. For this reason, the formula E=mc^2 is a circular argument. It explains mass with energy and energy with mass. Mass is only indirectly energy and vice versa. Both have nothing to do with each other in a direct sense. Energy is a 3D space phenomenon and mass is a 4D space phenomenon. In this sense, the pulse as m▪c is the result of the impact and not the impact itself.
3.) The theoretical aspect mentioned under 2.) is rounded off with the assumption that 3D space is influenced by shadows of higher dimensions. The primary field of a particle is created by the 4D impact, but cannot be derived with E=hF of an energy quantum. The energy value of a particle is not directly coherent with the 4D amplitude of its primary field.
4.) The other fields around the primary field are the result of the 3D space and are referred to here as resonance fields. Their relationship with one another is quantized i.e. ΔE=3•hF. The factor 3 comes from the fact that Δλ=λ2-λ1 is equal to the ratio of the onion field size 3^x, i.e. the next larger resonance field is 3 times larger (in the upper picture M1 to M2 etc.). A particle therefore presents itself as a primary field surrounded by resonance fields arranged in the shape of an onion. It is these that interact between the particles. Not the primary fields.
5.) All resonance fields are located in the 3 ^ x scales. They are separated by fields of the scales of even numbers (S2; S4; S6; etc.). Energies cannot be held in such fields. These standards are those of entropy. An energy range is therefore always a field with a scale of an odd number, the resonances in the scale S3; S9; S27; S81 can be found.
6.) All energies of standing fields in 3D space are oscillation, their radii were therefore designated as λ. See here "oscillation instead of a rigid space", "hyperspace and SUSI the supersymmetry" in part 2. There are therefore 4 states of oscillation: (+ +) (+ -) (- +) (- -).
7.) In the further consideration, however, the energy states of (-) time are not used, instead the term parity is added. The proton here has parity (+), which means that we arbitrarily only consider this part (+) of the oscillation. An electron therefore always has parity (-) in this consideration. It would be more correct to say that the electron always has the opposite parity where it meets a proton.
8.) According to the explanation of the particles as oscillation, see charge / parity in Part 2, standing fields always attract each other. Their centers converge until the amplitudes become too steep. This can be explained like a mountaineer who has to climb up a mountain and then into an even deeper valley. After each mountain an even deeper valley appears and an even steeper mountain. At some point he lacks strength and falls back into the last valley. When the particles interact, their external fields penetrate each other until the amplitudes become too steep.
The part of the resonance fields that is called the charge field is pushed
into one another. Blue = electron, red = proton. The charge field has small,
centrally arranged subfields, which are shown here as fields with ever
Bottom: The same scenario but with a smaller distance between the particles. The distance between the centers depends on the local entropy, i.e. Density of the surrounding space.
Above: Interaction of a proton with an electron. The repulsive area as a distance is larger there because of the opposite parity than with the same parity.
Below: fields with the same parity also attract each other. However, the energy level of the repelling area is much higher. In the case of protons it is the energy level of the atomic core.
For a deeper understanding:
The particle fields are standing fields consisting of the primary field and the centrally arranged secondary fields. An interaction happens in the field sizes S9 - S27. In this area are the charge fields of the EM space designated by physics, a somewhat confusing designation, since it is basically the same space as S1 - S9. All interactions of standing fields are based on the assumption that the structure of space (its network) is pulled together by oscillations. Since all particles are oscillations, there is generally a compression of space, which is referred to here as entropy and is therefore greater than the zero density of space. When the oscillating vibrations are canceled (classic as interference or (+) and (-) combination), this effect allows space to become smoothed, which has the opposite effect of compression. The attraction and repulsion arise from these two spatial states. The attraction is therefore a hyper-function but also a special disposition of the centric fields, while the repulsion is only the function of a special disposition of the secondary fields. In the realm of EM space scale (S9 - S27), these effects are assigned to the participating particles (proton-electron) as an intrinsic property, which has now become the property of space, not a property of its particle.
The basic forces of physics
pix from Wissenschaftsmagazin Scinexx
The matrix offers an explanation that all basic forces of physics can be derived directly from the scale of the spatial structure. Basically, E=h▪c/λ also applies here. It is dependent on the matrix rod length λ. Although referred to as force, they do not correspond to the normal image of the term "force". They are always an interaction and are always an oscillation. You basically have 2 counterpoints, which always have a distance. The change of the distance is periodic, i.e. it has length and frequency. Depending on the arrangement of the attempts at subatomic research and indirect measurement methods, they have the most varied of sizes. Since quantum dynamics only allows discrete values, these values were seen as separate particles. Of course, only electrical and magnetic quantities could be measured, which are considered to be indirect evidence as flashes of light. Of course, space as the medium of all particles knows 4 quantum states. Others like parity are added. As we will see when looking at the particles later, we have to include the 3D space, the time as (+) and (-) and a 4th space dimension, since particles are always seen as standing waves.
The strong nuclear force is responsible for the chromodynamics in the SM (Standard Model). Here in a nutshell: The matrix sees it as the impact in the center of an octahedron. The 3 diagonals of the octahedron create a chain of always the same colors, in this sense they are energy highways. They are considered quarks by the Standard Model (SM). The matrix theory sees them as flashes of light with a lifespan of about 1o^(-25) years and not as particles. It is the interaction within S1 that only occurs in the case of core destructions in the LHC (e.g. CERN in Geneva).
The weak nuclear force is in the area S1 to S3 as a Pauli field, but also in the area S3 to S9 in the neutrino realm (during the formation of neutron stars and beta decay). We can see several deviations from the SM here. However, these lie mainly in the interpretation. The matrix has the advantage of a fixed spatial structure, which can be used for orientation, especially in the area of quantum dynamics. Most of the changes in this realm are in S5, S7 and S9. The interactions there result in a completely new view of the neutrinos. In part 4 it is explained in more depth
The electromagnetic range is in the order of magnitude of the scales S9 to S27. It is the charge fields of protons and electrons, which must have the same energy level. Because of this, they interact on the same scale. The energy quanta are the photons. From the perspective of the matrix space they are exactly the same for electrons or protons, but have the opposite parity.
The electroweak interaction is the area of chemical bonds. The matrix provides the area S27 to S81 for this. The energy quanta of the interaction are mostly kinetic energy quants, which can, however, also trigger photons. They are the range of black radiation that Max Planck used for his quantum theory. A spatial quantum structure is hardly possible here and the laws of classical analog physics predominantly apply.
Of course there are other areas of quantized energies. However, these are not recognized as particles. The original one-dimensional field-to-field interactions, with the multitude of fields involved, become effects analogous to classical physics.
What role does the Planck constant h play in the matrix?
What is actually h? h = E/F, it is the pulse energy of an oscillation sequence of frequency F. Since h is invariant, E and F are proportionally coherent. h would be the individual impact here, which results in the sum of the measurable energy. h = E/F ↔ (m▪c^2/c)▪λ , ↔ mc▪λ
Therefore h is a moment, the bending moment Pulse ▪ λ. Theoretically, this formula knows 2 limit values: 1.) m = infinite and λ = zero. 2.) m = zero and λ = infinite
Limit value 1: From the point of view of the matrix, the
value λ of the subatomic forces at S1 (the scale of the proton ~
1.3▪10^(-15) m) and the value m at the rest mass of the proton ~ 938 MeV.
Limit value 2: It is probably much smaller than assumed. It is of the order of magnitude where a quantum effect can no longer be detected. From then on the impact h=mc▪λ remains almost always the same and approaches the formula of distribution 1/λ^2 as in case of light or gravity.
A vibrating construction would be conceivable, which vibrates faster when
compressed (path with the same V=c would be smaller and the number of
kickbacks greater). Conversely, the impulse of a cosmic scale would be on
its own most of the time and at some point a rebound would no longer be
possible. There the energy distribution would be E=∆E/λ^2. The impact would
then always have the same size regardless of λ, the distance from the
center. Only the increasingly thinner distribution depending on the distance
We are in the order of magnitude of gravity
And here we find the weakest force in the SM, gravity, the last recognized basic force in physics. In the matrix, however, it is just another realm or scale of interaction. The fields of quantum dynamics are no longer recognizable. With a field size of one meter, countless fields culminate in the range of 1 m . In my opinion, what has not yet been recognized in physics is that their interaction basically still has the one-dimensional size of E=hF. How is this to be understood: One-dimensional is always a "string". Contrary to the string theory, this is not a string "per se", but has an origin (S1; S3; S9) and works up to a distance unknown to us. On the way he becomes the distribution of 1/r^2 according to the well-known geometrical laws. "r" is here the radius and replaces the λ of the field.
Here is a typical popular false image of gravity. Who says here that there is a downward force. Where in the space is down?
It creates the wrong image of curved space, which in reality is the compression of space. Time is also compressed in it, i.e. that light needs longer for its passage of this area.
The world strings
As described above, the ping-pong force h=mc▪λ hardly has any
effect, since the path of the impulse or pulse with V=c is too long and the
frequency becomes less than 1. Since the distance is omitted from the
quantum dynamic formula, E=hf for long distance it becomes then E=h. Here it is referred
to as a pulse. The pulse creates the standing field on a quantum scale. As
described in the previous article, this generates the resonance fields as a
secondary effect of 3D space. For reasons of geometric harmony, these are
always larger in the ratio of 3^x to the next field.
The moderate puls is therefore getting smaller and smaller. The moderate pulse is actually the multiple pulse effect per unit of time. The time results from c/λ, i.e. the larger λ, the larger the time interval between the individual pulses and thus the smaller the number of impacts. In this sense, the moderate pulse becomes weaker. In sense of analog physics, the distance then increases. But even on the scale of quantum theory, the spherical fields are only probabilities. The physicist speaks of the collapse of wave function when there is an interaction. Since probability has no physical reality, the pulse is only a string from its start, but due to its high oscillation it is seen as a static structure. In quantum theory, the idea of spherical fields makes sense, as these result in the geometry of a matrix of always the same field distances. On a larger scale, it makes sense to see the pulse and also the moderate pulse as a string. As a string, however, there is no dependence on frequency F and the oscillation wave λ, only the 2-dimensional energy dilution 1/r^2 applies. It's like with the sea urchin: the closer to the body of the sea urchin, the denser the spines. Inside the sea-urchin body we only find a moderate pulse instead of the spines (single pulse). In the area of the spines we are in the area of world strings. They still act as a moderate string in the measuring range of our instruments, but they already have the distribution type of gravity or E=1/r^2.
The gravitational force then becomes F=G•m/r2. For theorists: The quantum theory would not be violated. Neither does field theory. The wave collapse was described with the one-dimensional formula E=hF. So the string theory also has its explanation. With matrix theory also only 1-dimensional interactions are possible.
The fireworks of "Large Hadron Collider" reinterpreted
Let us remember Einstein's condition for space itself. Der Matrix Raum
“Nothing is more important than the fact that space isn't empty. He is the substance of the most powerful physical forces. " - John Archibald Wheeler
The matrix theory does not accept any separate fields or spaces, i.e. no completely detached parts of space with independent properties that are defined as quantum numbers in the SM (Standard Model). All properties defined as quantum numbers are actually local properties of the space, which thus serves as the medium of oscillating moments. A particle in SM is therefore only the locality, where its moments, its vibrational values, its state of relationship to the surrounding space entropy, its color value of the QCT etc. are such, that it is recognized by the SM as a specific particle.
A particle therefore does not find its way through space by pushing it aside; it propagates as a bundle of moments through the structure what forms the medium of space. The matrix consists of a structure in different scales, which forms a different resonance with respect to the basic frequency and therefore also has its own metric. The Planck constant h still applies here. This creates scale-dependent energy densities, i.e. rod lengths of the network nodes, frequencies that are amplified or suppressed from the resonance to the base frequency, look in Scale of matrix . The relativistic changes in its values (Lorentz factor) are also quantized. This means here, the values within a scale and therefore within a frequency remain the same and have fixed values in its scale. However, the ratio of two such values (two measures) would have to be also an integer number.
The large picture shows that with the matrix space
structure and its integral values, local destruction in LHC can only produce
structural debris with integral values. As mentioned before, quarks can be
derived from the 3 diagonals of the octahedron, but gluons from the rod
lengths of the surrounding tetrahedron. However, the scales have different
energy values, which means that gluons are seen as carriers of different
energies. However, things get even more complicated when e = h▪f is
applied consistently. Then it is the (mostly kinetic) energy of the
projectile that determines the rod length of the debris (λ=c/f -> λ=c▪h/e).
This is how the particle generations of the SM arise. It is clear that the
chromodynamic values of QCD come from colors of the matrix (++ + -
- - + -).
In the SM they are represented as ↑↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ↑ ↓↓. Mathematically, quarks are valued as 1, but in the matrix as 1/√2. This is because all values in the matrix are based on scale S1 with rod length 1. The diagonals act with the ½ distance (1/√2 or 1/2•√2) to the center of the deficiency color. The distances between the nodes of the octahedron in S1, however, have the size 1. The SM, however, sets the reference to the quarks, which get the value 1 in their theorising of QCD. This makes all the values of other rod lengths in the QCD 1/√2. It is theoretically not wrong, but it is not practical. It is assumed in the SM that quarks form the basis of our material world. However, this is a dead end of thinking. How can a basic element have a lifespan of only 10^-25 seconds and add to it, is approx. 200 times larger than its container, the proton. In other hand lifetime of a proton is about >10^50 times longer than that of a quark.
The end of the story is that the matrix it self cannot be changed by any projectile energy, however large. The octahedron of a proton can be shot free of its specific moments, but never be destroyed. The energy of projectile also consists of a bundle of moments that hit the moments of the target with great severity and explode there star like into colorful fireworks, whereby all players in this game are moments where only get their intrinsic values from their position and relation to the matrix. We consider them as individual particles, their true nature but, the matrix, is recognized as emptiness.
It is the “empty” space of Einstein that replaces the ether and replace our apparent truth to become an illusion. Space is the medium and therefor can't have holes.
Matrix and the illusion of particles
The matrix explains empty space as the medium of all physical things. The matrix as a geometric structure of a space of tetrahedral and octahedral is seen from our point of view as nothingness, since its elements, the tetrahedral, are in themselves an equilibrium of all its properties. The sum of its moments is zero. The matrix becomes invisible. The disturbances of this equilibrium in the form of oscillations result in things that make up our world.
Normal disturbances or momenta propagate with V = c through the matrix structure of our 3D space. They are vector momenta, oscillations, which change their position by the parity of their oscillation. If the matrix structure is not recognized, these disturbances are seen as separate particles. Physics therefore speaks of photons or bosons instead of oscillating momenta.
If disturbances are generated by pressure, density and time dilations, they form an anomaly in the centre of the tetrahedron spaces, i.e. the octahedron, which has a 3-color structure, creates the 4th color as a deficit color in its centre. This is a compressed property or moment that can only have a point size effect. But since a point cannot be a vector, this point size becomes a vector to the 4th spatial dimension. As such, it is a local oscillation of the matrix structure. However, if the matrix structure is not recognized and seen only as a void in space, then this local oscillation becomes a separate particle. In addition, the high frequency of the oscillation cannot be recognized either, which means that its parities become special properties of particles. The parities are generated by the 4 color cycle and form a double oscillation between energy densities and (+/-) time. The scale in the matrix creates the energy size of these particles and therefore their type. Further, secondary resonances in 3D space show further properties, which will be described in part 4 of matrix
These particles, the fermions, are seen as separate objects by today's physics, although they are only disturbing momenta in the vibrating matrix structure. For thousands of years of human history, only empty space filled with separate particles has been seen, without realizing that particles are only a disturbance of space (or “nothingness” in their prospect). Physics has reached here the limit of its knowledge. Without the recognition of a structural space-time-pulse mesh, the matrix, no real progress in physics can be expected.
The end of the story gives terrifying results. There are no particles, no emptiness in space and indeed no gaps at all. Our physical universe doesn't really exist as a separate thing. We are only properties of a medium, a reality that can never be directly experienced. We're just the song, not the singer. But this terrible recognition, which breaks our arrogance, also has advantages. If we know the medium, if we recognize the matrix, then we master inertia, space and time. We give our science and physics the chance to explore antigravity and time shifts, things that today's physicist would never dare to think about.
Part 3 tried to give us more tools for looking and understanding at fermions, which will be covered in Part 4. An attempt was made to show a continuous causal line from quantum theory to the scale of our natural analogue environment. It is based on a structure in the smallest detail that is based on space, time and pulse. These 3 terms can only be explained with themselves. They are all invariant at its base. In this way space can be explained with time, time with space. The pulse, however, comes from 4D space, so its size cannot be derived from space and time. At some point in the future the 4D space will also be controllable by us, then only the resistance of the medium, of our univers, pulse remains as an axiom, left for further explanation.